Sacred cow projects are characterized by being suggested by whom?

Sacred cow projects are characterized by being suggested primarily by senior leadership or powerful constituents within an organization. These projects typically receive special treatment and support, regardless of their practical benefits or alignment with the organization's current goals. The term "sacred cow" underscores that these projects are often untouchable and may continue despite objections or questions regarding their value.

The involvement of senior leadership or powerful constituents signifies the influence they wield within the organization, which can shield these projects from rigorous scrutiny typically applied to other initiatives. Such projects may be pursued due to personal preferences, historical significance, or the relationships of those in power, rather than through objective evaluation or feasibility studies.

In contrast, projects proposed by junior staff members or middle management may not carry the same level of influence or exalted status, making them less likely to receive the same prominence or resource allocation. External consultants, while often providing valuable insights and recommendations, usually do not initiate projects deemed sacred cows unless they align with the priorities established by senior leaders. Thus, the nature of sacred cow projects uniquely highlights the intersection of power dynamics and project prioritization within organizations.